Drivers abusing parent and child parking spaces is shocking

Photo of author

By Creative Media News

  • Survey reveals high misuse of parent and child parking spaces
  • Majority of parents face challenges parking with young children
  • Vehicle size mismatch in parking lots leads to damages

In a startling new survey, many drivers acknowledged violating one of the most significant parking lot regulations.

More than a quarter (28 percent) of drivers utilize’ parent and child’ spaces when they do not have a child in the vehicle.

This further elucidates why approximately 55% of parents need space when they visit crowded parking lots, such as retail centers and supermarkets.

Insurer Churchill surveyed 2,000 drivers, 500 parents of children under the age of 14, and 542 parents of children aged zero to six in a recent study regarding their parking experiences and behaviours.

37% of those with small children report being compelled to park in standard-sized spaces because all the designated spaces were occupied. This was problematic because standard-sized spaces were too narrow to enter and exit infants quickly.

Standard-size parking spaces (4.8 meters in length and 2.4 meters in width) provide only 30 centimetres of space to depart a vehicle, which is, on average, 17 centimetres insufficient for passengers using car seats for newborns that are removable from the vehicle. 

In addition to being closer to building entrances, “parent and child” parking spaces provide an average of 120cm of additional space between bays, affording drivers a combined 150cm of space to park and exit their vehicles securely.

As per the regulations, the designated bays may only be utilized by custodians or parents accompanying children under 12 into the establishment.

Nonetheless, an alarming proportion of motorists are willing to circumvent the regulations by parking in one without any minor in tow. 

The report was published after it was revealed that five local councils are now enforcing length restrictions on vehicles permitted to use their public parking lots.

According to a recent investigation by Autocar, Wokingham, South Hams, Broadland South Norfolk, and West Devon, they have all implemented a 5-meter restriction.

Automobiles such as the Audi A8 and Kia’s electric EV9 SUV, the most recent Range Rover, and both the Tesla Model S and Model X EVs surpass this limitation and are thus deemed “unremarkable.”

Thurrock Council enforces a marginally more permissive length restriction of 5.35 metres. Consequently, individuals who own Land Rover Defender 130 (5,358mm) or BMW 7 Series (5,319mm) vehicles and utilize these authority-operated parking lots will incur fines.

Additionally, weight and height restrictions apply to these and all other council-operated parking lots.

This is in response to multiple reports that the parking bay dimensions in the United Kingdom need to be updated, as the regulations from the 1970s are no longer adequate for the larger vehicles currently sold in showrooms. 

91.8% of the 287 local authorities that complied with the automobile publication’s freedom of information request this year stated that they have yet to make plans to enlarge the council-operated parking spaces to accommodate the significantly larger vehicles of today.

When parents have toddlers in rear-facing and rotating car seats, the available space in a standard parking space is inadequate to completely open the door for secure lifting of the children in and out. 

A significant proportion of driving parents (71 percent) have encountered difficulties fitting their infant into their car seat due to insufficient space. Specifically, 44% of these parents reported encountering this difficulty at least once per month.

Alarmingly, one in four parents (23 percent) have to frequently allow their children to exit the vehicle before parking in a location due to a lack of space when they are 14 years old or younger. 

One-fifth (18%) of parents with children under the age of six have been forced to leave the car seat in the vehicle because they were unable to remove it, and an additional 17% have previously injured themselves while attempting to remove a car seat in a parking lot.

Impacts and scratches caused by parking lot impacts are expensive.

Parent and child lanes being inaccessible to motorists with children is inconvenient and potentially costly.

When compelled to park in narrower standard-size lanes, the driver and adjacent vehicles are frequently subjected to dents and scratches. 

Repairing this damage costs British motorists an average of £223.50, according to the insurer. 

A total of 9% of the parents surveyed indicated that they had damaged their own vehicle while attempting to remove a car seat; an additional 10% admitted to damaging the vehicle adjacent to them.

“Unlock your financial potential with free Webull shares in the UK.”

Damage claims place an additional burden on the average premiums for all motorists, as the size of the most recent vehicles contributes to an increase in such cases. 

Head of Churchill Motor Insurance, Nicholas Mantel, stated, “Parents are all-too-familiar with the agony of driving around in a parking lot in a never-ending circle in search of a space for themselves and their children, only to discover that the already limited spaces have been occupied by individuals without children.” 

Parents are particularly affected by the congestion caused by widening parking spaces and automobiles that still need redesigned to accommodate modern models. Those with neonatal baby seats, who require additional space to remove their infants from vehicles, are particularly affected. 

“Misusing parent and child bays can result in a hefty parking charge notice in addition to causing inconvenience to parents who truly require them.”

Read More

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to content