- Starmer praises Thatcher, sparks backlash
- Labour seeks Conservative voters
- Party undergoes significant transformation
The Labour leader asserts that the party has undergone “shock therapy” to realign with the priorities of British voters and has undergone “significant change” since Jeremy Corbyn was in control.
A rebuke ensued within Sir Keir Starmer’s political party after he commended Margaret Thatcher for implementing “meaningful change” in the United Kingdom.
To attract Conservative voters, the Labour leader urged them to “reexamine” his party before the upcoming general election.
In an article for The Sunday Telegraph, Sir Keir stated that he extends a hand of fellowship to all Britons, regardless of their previous political allegiances.
![Starmer's thatcher praise sparks internal party backlash Starmer's thatcher praise sparks internal party backlash](https://i0.wp.com/creativemedia.news/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/backlash.png?resize=640%2C427&ssl=1)
Starmer’s Laudations of Thatcher
However, the remarks that garnered the most attention were the Labour leader’s laudations of the late Baroness Thatcher, whom he claimed “driven substantial transformation” in the United Kingdom by “releasing our innate entrepreneurial spirit” during her eleven years in Downing Street.
Left-wing MPs Incensed
Some MPs on the left wing of his party were incensed by the remarks, believing it indicated that Sir Keir “intends to govern without a genuine political project of his own.”
It means that transformational or substantive change is not an option, they added.
He is, in essence, holding the point of the Conservative party as they ready themselves to assume control of the nation once more.
From privatisation and the poll tax, which ultimately resulted in her downfall, to the Falklands War and the acrimonious year-long miners’ strike, the first female prime minister of the United Kingdom continues to be an extremely divisive figure in British politics.
The Labour Member of Parliament for Liverpool West Derby, Ian Byrne, wrote on X: “Hunger, inequity, poverty, and suffering. “That is the true legacy that Margaret Thatcher bequeathed.”
Liverpool Riverside representative Kim Johnson stated that Margaret Thatcher did nothing for working-class communities in Liverpool and throughout the nation: she privatised our essential industries, attacked trade unionists, and destroyed industries.
Sir Keir endeavoured to emphasise elsewhere in his article that his party had undergone significant transformations since Jeremy Corbyn led it.
He wrote that individuals throughout the United Kingdom are disillusioned, frustrated, angry, and anxious. “Few of them, who have consistently voted Conservative, now believe their party has abandoned them.” I am aware of that.
“I recognised this within my own political party and took action to rectify the situation. However, I am also cognizant of the fact that many remain apprehensive regarding Labour. Again, I request that they take a peek at us.
He further contended that “Labour has undergone a profound transformation” since Mr Corbyn was leader and that his party had been subjected to “shock therapy” to ensure that it remained “founded in the aspirations, concerns, and priorities of ordinary Britons.
Labour’s Vision for Change and Critique
Sir Keir elaborated on his remarks, stating that he intended to draw a parallel between the “drift” experienced in recent years and the “sense of mission” exhibited by former leaders, such as Clement Attlee and Sir Tony Blair, who were Labour prime ministers.
He explained, “That does not mean I support her [Thatcher’s] actions, but I do not believe anyone could argue that she lacked a compelling sense of purpose.”
In contrast to the Conservatives led by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, Sir Keir asserted that the government has been estranging itself from the people through “years of sowing empty promises, cynical falsehoods, and false dawns.”
The opposition leader asserted that the present condition of the United Kingdom is equivalent to a national disgrace and that the nation ceases to function as intended.
When queried about Sir Keir’s commendation of Baroness Thatcher, Jonathan Reynolds, the shadow business secretary, responded that the article’s central argument was that Labour could serve as the “vehicle for change in the United Kingdom.
When queried about his support for Margaret Thatcher, Mr Reynolds responded, “I do not hold that view. However, it is undeniable that she posed a formidable challenge.
Victoria Atkins, the health secretary, had faith that the general public would “see this for what it is.”
She cautioned Sir Trevor not to forget that he was not appealing to the entrepreneurial spirit of Margaret Thatcher when vying for ballots from the hard left.
And I have my suspicion that the great woman herself would say the following to a man attempting to capitalise on her success: “Absolutely not.”
In addition, Mr Sunak faced criticism for his inability to control immigration; Sir Keir termed the Prime Minister’s blunder “a betrayal” when net migration increased despite repeated Conservative assurances that the number would decline.
In addition, Sir Keir denounced the “illogical” notion that certain subjects are “off limits” for the Labour Party, pledging to “destroy the criminal gangs fattening on the misery of human trafficking.”
The opposition claims that “all signals” point to a May election, as indicated by the most recent polling figures, which place Labour ahead of the Tories by 20 points.