- Flack’s mother criticizes police for charging her daughter
- Alleges police treated Flack differently due to celebrity status
- Calls for explanation from Metropolitan Police regarding Flack’s case
Flack’s mother says that the depiction of her daughter as a domestic abuser “hurts” her and that the police’s charges against her daughter lacked “any written justification.”
Caroline Flack’s mother has stated that the Metropolitan Police’s decision to charge the television host with domestic violence was likely influenced by her daughter’s celebrity status.
Chris Flack has demanded an explanation from the Metropolitan Police regarding the events preceding the murder of her daughter.
It follows the force’s announcement that the circumstances surrounding the decision to charge the television host with assaulting her fiancé would be reexamined.
A coroner determined that the former Love Island host, aged 40, committed suicide in February 2020 after realizing she was certain to face prosecution.
Flack’s mother stated that the Metropolitan Police exerted “no written rationale” to support the accusation against her daughter.
She stated on The UK Tonight With Sarah-Jane Mee, “The IOPC [Independent Office for Police Conduct] has uncovered every single one of these improper activities.”
The recommendation that Flack receive only a caution from the CPS was reversed after the Met’s appeal.
In December 2019, she was ultimately charged with assault by beating in connection with the incident involving her fiancé Lewis Burton.
Flack’s mother stated, “Domestic violence did not occur here.” This occurred by accident. However, what stings is that she was portrayed as a domestic abuser in court and the press. “That is precisely what I desire eliminated, since she was not one.”
She stated that the police’s decision was likely influenced by her daughter’s celebrity status, adding that she had an email from the coroner’s court stating that the force treated her daughter differently.
“Their perception of the police’s treatment of her indicated that they were treating her differently.” That is not even on. “Both worse and better treatment should be avoided for her.”
When queried about her daughter’s account, Ms. Flack responded, “I believe she was merely complying.” She lacked knowledge regarding any liberties. She was simply unaware. It was abjectly abhorrent to be confined within a confinement.
Because of her mental health, she required monitoring every thirty minutes.” “She was eligible for return home.
She further stated, “Their actions that evening were improper, and I doubt that many individuals would have been affected by them.”
The Metropolitan Police stated on March 7 that it referred a family complaint against Flack to the IOPC.
Ms Flack stated that Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, “won’t talk to me” despite her repeated requests for meetings with him.
She further stated, “I’ve also been informed that nationwide police departments are implementing brand-new protocols in response to the incident involving Carrie.” “That was intended to make me feel better, but it doesn’t because I don’t believe anything will alter my mind.”
“Unlock your financial potential with free Webull shares in the UK.”
Additional inquiries are being conducted by the Metropolitan Police in light of the possibility that “new witness evidence” pertains to the conduct of officers during the appeal of the CPS decision.
A previous determination by the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) that the case lacked misconduct prompted Flack’s family to file a second complaint with the IOPC.
It also found no malfeasance on the part of the Metropolitan Police but ordered the force to apologize for failing to document the reason for its appeal against the caution.
At the time, Flack’s mother declined the contrition.
