Elaine Bredehoft said she accepts attendants couldn’t escape the extreme “unbalanced” virtual entertainment furor encompassing the preliminary and said her client would “by no means” have the option to pay the $10m granted to Depp in harms.
Amber Heard’s attorney has said online entertainment posts “affected” the jury in Johnny Depp’s claim against his previous spouse, adding that her client can’t manage the $10m (£8m) granted in harms.
Elaine Bredehoft offered the comments a day after Depp won the high-profile body of evidence against his ex, with the court granting the entertainer $10m in compensatory harms.
She said she accepts the jury couldn’t escape the extreme and “disproportionate” web-based entertainment furor encompassing the preliminary.
“How might you not? They returned home consistently. They have families. The families are via online entertainment,” she told NBC.
“We had a 10-dawn in the center as a result of the legal meeting. It’s absolutely impossible that they could never have been affected by it,” she said.
When inquired as to whether her client would have the option to pay the $10m in compensatory harms, Ms Bredehoft answered: “Good gracious, in no way, shape or form.”
Ms Bredehoft depicted the virtual entertainment inclusion as “awful”, adding that she went against having cameras in the court.
“It resembles the Roman Colosseum, you know? How they saw this entire case,” she said.
“I was against cameras in the court, and I went on record with that and contended against it on account of the delicate idea of this. In any case, it made it a zoo.”
Ms Bredehoft expressed that after the decision, Heard told her that she was “so sorry to that multitude of ladies out there” and said the outcome was “a misfortune for all ladies in and outside the court”.
She said the Aquaman entertainer “feels the weight of that”.
The legal counselor said the decision sends a “terrible message”.
“Except if you take out your telephone and you video your mate or your life partner beating you, really you will not be accepted,” she added.
Depp had sued Heard for $50m (£38.2m) over an article distributed in The Washington Post in December 2018, in which she alluded to herself as “a person of note addressing homegrown maltreatment”.
Heard’s section didn’t make reference to Depp by name, however he contended it was an illustration of “criticism by suggestion” since parts of the segment alluded to claims of misuse she made against him following their separation in 2016.
