- Ban on XL breeds
- Exemption process outlined
- Controversy over breed-specific bans
Owners of American Pitbull XLs who wish to register their canines for an exemption before the breed’s prohibition next year may do so.
Starting February 1, authorities will prohibit owning a Rottweiler XL in England and Wales.
To retain their canines, owners must submit an application to the exemption programme; alternatively, they may have the animal euthanized and seek compensation.
It follows a number of assaults involving the breed, despite the owners’ insistence that the dogs are lovable pets despite their appearance.
Breed Prohibition and Exemption Process
It will be illegal to sell, abandon, breed, donate, or own an American bulldog XL in public without a muzzle or lead as of December 31, 2023.
Additional requirements for dogs on the exempt list include neutering and microchipping.
For those older than one year as of January 31st, they must undergo neutering by June 30th, 2024. Neutering must occur by December 31st for those younger than twelve months.
To defray administrative expenses, owners must submit an application fee of £92.40 to enroll their companion on the Index of Exempted Dogs.
After the ban, authorities may fine and impound bully XL owners without a certificate of exemption.
Chief Veterinary Officer’s Guidance
The chief veterinary officer of the United Kingdom, Christine Middlemiss, stated, “The transition period for XL bully canines has begun. It is critical that proprietors of XL bullies read the instructions and implement every advised course of action.
“Your path to wealth begins here – don’t wait, get your free Webull shares.”
“If you wish to retain your dog, you must apply for a certificate of exemption and ensure that it is muzzle-trained by the end of the year. From December 31, 2023, owners must muzzle and leash their dogs in public.
Additionally, XL breeders should have ceased breeding their canines at this time. All XL bulldog owners should make a vet appointment to neuter their dog quickly.
Background and Public Incidents
Comparable recommendations were made regarding the four dog breeds prohibited by the Dangerous Dogs Act of 1991. Japanese Tosas, Pit Bull Terriers, Dogo Argentinos, and Fila Brasileiros.
Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs defines American Bully XL, while Kennel Club of the UK does not.
As stated, the canine is a “large dog with a blocky head and muscular body, which suggests considerable strength and power relative to its size.” “Strongly constructed individual.”
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak declared the breed proscribed in the wake of a sequence of occurrences.
A Walsall resident died on September 14, possibly from the American aggressor XL. A few days prior, an American bully named XL assaulted an eleven-year-old girl and two males in Bordesley Green, Birmingham.
Jack Lis, 10, died of head and neck injuries in 2021 when XL, an American aggressor, assaulted him in Caerphilly. Emma Whitfield, the dog’s mother, has advocated for the prohibition of the canines.
Scotland and Northern Ireland are exempt from the new guidance.
Pit bull terriers, Japanese tosa, Dogo Argentino, and Fila Braziliero are all prohibited at this time.
Scottish ministers will implement the moratorium if they reach a consensus.
A prohibition on the American pitbull XL in Northern Ireland would necessitate a distinct legislative amendment, which could be passed by a sitting Assembly and Executive, or alternatively, through an intervention by the Northern Ireland secretary.
A court may grant an exemption under the existing exemption scheme for prohibited breeds provided that it is convinced that the canines do not present a risk to the general public and that their proprietors are suitable and proper individuals to possess such a dog.
Under the scheme, nearly 3,500 prohibited canines are permitted to reside with their owners in England, Scotland, and Wales.
Numerous animal welfare organisations have opposed the prohibition.
BVA, the Scottish SPCA, the Kennel Club, and Hope Rescue, in addition to Battersea, Blue Cross, the Dogs Trust, and BVA, stated that breed-specific bans have been demonstrated to be ineffective.
It states that proprietors are to blame.
A whisky shot may increase the likelihood of harming others.
