- Ehud Barak on Hamas attack.
- Concerns about Netanyahu’s leadership.
- Goals for peace with Palestinians.
The unprecedented assault by Hamas, according to Ehud Barak, was “shocking for everyone in the country.” Additionally, he asserts that the Middle East is further from peace than it was twenty-five years ago and that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should not ultimately remain in office.
In light of Hamas’s unprecedented incursion, a former prime minister of Israel has stated that Benjamin Netanyahu should not continue to serve as the country’s leader in the long term.
The attack, according to Ehud Barak, was “shocking for the entire nation.”
“It is an unprecedented barbaric homicidal act reminiscent of operations carried out by al-Qaeda or Daesh.
“It was the most severe blow Israel suffered since the day of its establishment,” according to him.
“Don’t miss out! Grab your free shares of Webull UK today!”
“If asked whether Mr. Netanyahu can maintain his position as prime minister over time, he replied, ‘I believe he shouldn’t.'” In an ideal environment, I believe he would have tendered his resignation.
Merely considering the nature of the event that transpired under his watch, notwithstanding his lack of direct involvement, instilled within him an immense personal obligation.
As the current opposition spokesman, Mr. Barak, who was prime minister of Israel from 1999 to 2001, stated that the objective of the Israeli response was “well defined”: “It is to ensure that Hamas’s military capabilities are neutralised and eradicated.
“There is an absence of military cover, rocket launchers, magazine dumps, laboratories, and training sites.” Indeed, that is the objective.
It would have been ideal if the mission could have been executed remotely. However, such a feat is unattainable, necessitating ground-based participation. Consequently, it is highly probable that a massive operation will be conducted on the ground.
When asked how Israel can prevent civilian casualties, Mr. Barak responded, “Israel will not descend into Hamas-like territory.” Our utmost dedication lies in upholding international law.
“[To] the populace, we declared our intention to destroy every Hamas asset.” Therefore, any Citizen of Gaza who is aware that there is a Hamas installation or asset in his or her residence or place of employment within the last year or two should exercise caution.
“This object is intended for use.” Vacate the vicinity. Avoid remaining there. “We take this matter seriously.”
Regarding the blockade on Gaza, he stated, “Israel will not allow patients to perish in a Gaza hospital because we have obstructed the hospital’s access to medical supplies, including drugs.” No infant will perish due to a lack of milk caused by Israel.”
A momentary halt was brought to the interview when a siren began to sound in the middle of it.
“Take my word for it, the missile will not land here,” stated Mr. Barak.
When asked whether his 2000 attempt to negotiate a peace agreement with the then-president of Palestine, Yasser Arafat, was a wasted opportunity, Mr. Barak responded, “One cannot definitively determine whether or not it was a missed chance. According to others, you were extraordinarily close to Arafat. Why have you been unable to reach a consensus?
“I assert that in order to determine the dimensions of a gap, the breadth must be multiplied by the depth. We were likely quite close, yet profoundly separated.
“At that time, [US President] Bill Clinton and I presented an extensive proposition that, metaphorically speaking, encompassed over 90% of all that Arafat could conceivably desire.
“The reason for his rejection… “To this day, Clinton maintains that Arafat is responsible when questioned, given that we approached the situation with great seriousness but he declined it.”
He stated, “We are further from a genuine peace than we were twenty-five years ago.”
“However, I maintain constant eye contact with the objective,” he continued.
“The goal should be engagement with the Palestinians and a solution involving a border within the Holy Land, where eighty percent of Israel’s settlers reside, in order to coexist with the demilitarised but somewhat viable Palestinian state.”
“That’s the vision because we need it.”
