Kathryn Arnold, an amusement enterprise expert, used the example of “comparable actors” to tell a jury what she believed the 36-12 months-antique’s career trajectory might have been without the poor statements made by Depp and his lawyer.
Entertainment industry professional Kathryn Arnold made the claim as it emerged British twiglet Kate Moss, who dated Depp in the 1990s, is predicted to appear in court by means of videolink on Wednesday.
Depp is suing Heard over a piece of writing she wrote inside the Washington Post in 2018, which his attorneys say falsely implies he bodily and sexually abused her while they have been together.
Heard is countersuing Depp for $100m (£80m).
This trial is taking place in Fairfax County, Virginia, after Depp lost a comparable defamation case within the UK in July 2020.
Ms Arnold, who was being puzzled by Heard’s criminal team on Monday, used the example of “similar actors” to measure what the 36-12 months-antique’s career trajectory could have been without the terrible statements made by means of Depp and his attorney Adam Waldman following the Hollywood couple’s cut up in 2016.
Ms Arnold stated she selected actors who played superhero characters of their breakout roles, have been handsome, have been a similar age, ought to do stunts and had exact acting talents.
The five stars she as compared Heard to had been Jason Momoa, Gal Gadot, Ana de Armas, Zendaya and Chris Pine.
Ms Arnold says they all were on an “upward trajectory” and “it would be very reasonable to suppose (Heard’s) profession would had been on (a similar) upward trajectory”.
She said all of the actors she mentioned had labored with numerous huge brands due to the fact that their preliminary fulfillment.
However, she says Heard had now not even managed to continue running for the one primary emblem she changed into hired by using, with cosmetic corporation L’Oréal having paused her appearance in its campaigns.
She added that Heard turned into looking at losses of “as an awful lot as $8m (£6m) through the years” because of loss of endorsement contracts.
Ms Arnold also stated she thinks Heard made round a $2m (£1.6m) loss from her role as Mera in Aquaman because of not being capable of negotiate a better price for the second movie.
She delivered that Aquaman superstar Jason Momoa negotiated his income up from $3m (£2.4m) to $4m (£three.2m) for the first film, and to $15m (£12m) for the second movie.
In contrast she says Heard’s revenue was negotiated from $1m (£795,000) to $2m (£1.6m).
She says Heard had “no leverage” to increase her pay as she was “fighting to hold the role”.
The enterprise professional added that she thought “over the route of 5 years it is reasonable to suppose (Heard) could had been in one film in keeping with 12 months for a minimum of $4m (£three.2m) according to film… And so would have lost as a minimum $20m (£16m) in profits”.
Ms Arnold concluded that Heard’s mixed lack of earnings across movie, TV and endorsements changed into among $45m (£36m) and $50m (£40m).
Earlier on Monday, hand healthcare professional Richard Moore said Depp could not have lost the tip of his center finger the manner he advised jurors it happened in his civil lawsuit towards Heard.
The finger injury, which occurred in a March 2015 combat in Australia between Depp and Heard, has been certainly one of several key factors of dispute inside the lawsuit.
Depp says he changed into injured while Heard threw a vodka bottle at him.
Mr Moore informed the jury on Monday that Depp had said his palm became down on a bar while it was struck by the bottle.
Moore, who did no longer deal with the Pirates of the Caribbean celebrity, testified that Depp’s description become not likely, in big part due to the fact his fingernail remained intact.
The trendy trends come as closing arguments had been expected in the trial on Friday.
