Most Popular

- Advertisement -

categories

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. 

Highlights

Technology

Global Powers in 2024: Technology, Military, and Economic Influence Unpacked

As we delve into 2024, the landscape of global power is shaped by a complex interplay of technological advancements, military capabilities, and economic influence. Understanding the dynamics among leading nations requires an examination of their strategic priorities and how they leverage their strengths to assert influence on the world stage. This article unpacks the multifaceted nature of global powers, highlighting the key players in technology, military strength, and economic dominance.
Ticketing system 1

Tickets ‘broken’ after Oasis ‘chaos’, resale site chief alleges

Viagogo's business development manager, Matt Drew, stated that Saturday's ticket sale for the band's first shows in 16 years "descended into chaos."A senior official at a resale site has stated that the ticketing system for shows, including next summer's Oasis concerts, is "broken."Viagogo's business development manager, Matt Drew, said Saturday's ticket sales for the band's first shows in 16 years "descended into chaos."
- Advertisement -
Selected menu has been deleted. Please select the another existing nav menu.

Boris Johnson gives Cabinet Office COVID files “full and unredacted.”

Share It:

Table of Content

The former prime minister’s spokesman requested the Cabinet Office “urgently disclose” the records to Lady Hallett’s COVID probe.

According to his spokesman, all of Boris Johnson’s WhatsApp communications and notebooks that were requested by the COVID investigation have been provided to the Cabinet Office “in full and unredacted form.”

The former prime minister wanted the Cabinet Office to “urgently” disclose the information to the investigation, according to the spokesperson.

Boris Johnson gives Cabinet Office COVID files "full and unredacted."

The former prime minister’s spokesman issued the following statement: “All of Boris Johnson’s requested materials, including WhatsApps and documents, have been delivered to the Cabinet Office in full and unredacted form”.

Mr. Johnson advises the Cabinet Office to disclose it immediately to the investigation.

“The Cabinet Office has had access to these documents for months. If requested, Mr. Johnson would promptly disclose it directly to the investigation”.

While Mr. Johnson is aware of the government’s position and has no intention of contradicting it. He has no objection to the inquiry having access to this information in whatever format it requires.

Mr. Johnson has fully cooperated with the investigation from the outset of this process, and he continues to do so. Indeed, he initiated the investigation. He anticipates continuing to assist the investigation with its crucial task.”

The intervention of Mr. Johnson’s staff will increase the pressure on the Cabinet Office, which has been under fire for withholding the documents requested by Lady Hallett, the inquiry’s chair.

Lady Hallett had ordered the government department to give over the former prime minister’s messages, along with diary entries and notes, by Tuesday, May 30 at 4:00 p.m.

However, the deadline was later extended to Thursday, June 1 at 4 p.m.

The inquiry awaits the Cabinet Office’s delivery of the requested documents by tomorrow’s deadline.

Later Wednesday, the Cabinet Office confirmed that it had received and was analysing the information.

Despite allegations of a cover-up, the Cabinet Office reaffirmed its refusal to hand over the documents last night, contending that the inquiry lacked the authority to request unambiguously irrelevant information that was outside the scope of the investigation.

The department stated that it has already provided “more than 55,000 documents, 24 personal witness statements, and eight corporate statements” and that “considerable time and effort” have been devoted to aiding the investigation over the past eleven months.

“However, we are firmly of the opinion that the investigation lacks the authority to request unambiguously irrelevant information that is outside the scope of this investigation.”

This includes government workers’ personal WhatsApp messages.

Lady Hallett has ordered that a statement be sent by a “senior civil servant” confirming that the Cabinet Office does not have the requested information, along with a chronology of the government’s communications with Mr. Johnson regarding the requests and whether the government has ever had the data.

The government could face criminal charges if it violates a Section 21 order. And there is also the possibility of a court conflict over whether the information should be provided to the inquiry.

Before the probe, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said “the government is carefully considering its position. But is confident in its approach.”

Labor and the Liberal Democrats have criticized Mr. Sunak for hesitating over the order, with Wes Streeting, the shadow health secretary, accusing the prime minister of being “slippery.

Mr. Streeting stated on Tuesday that Mr. Sunak should “comply with the inquiry and do it today”

“One minute, the government claims that the messages they possess are irrelevant. The next, they claim that they do not exist. Which one is it?

Mr. Johnson ordered Lady Hallet’s COVID probe in May 2021.

When asked if he was concerned about the possibility of a “cover-up,” Mr. Streeting responded, “I think the fact that the prime minister looks so slippery today will cause deep anxiety among those who are following the inquiry closely, especially those bereaved families who just want some honesty and answers.”

In May 2021, Mr. Johnson launched Lady Hallet’s independent COVID investigation to examine the government’s pandemic response.

The parties dispute Mr. Johnson’s epidemic communications, diaries, and notebooks.

The probe sent the Cabinet Office a formal notice last week for withholding Mr. Johnson’s conversations.

While the government believes it has no obligation to disclose “unambiguously irrelevant” information, Lady Hallett disagrees and has the final say under the Inquiries Act of 2005.

In her response to the government, she refuted their claim that the Cabinet Office decides what is “unambiguously irrelevant.”

She ruled that all these documents “contain information that is potentially relevant” to pandemic decision-making.

Tags :

Creative Media News

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Creative Media News is your premier source for the latest updates in finance, technology, and world events. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers in-depth analysis, breaking news, and expert opinions to keep you informed and engaged. Whether you’re interested in stock market trends, innovative tech, or global affairs, we’ve got you covered. Stay ahead with our reliable, timely, and insightful content. Join our community of readers who trust Creative Media News for accurate, up-to-date information. Follow us for daily updates and stay connected with the world’s most important stories.

Useful Links

Selected menu has been deleted. Please select the another existing nav menu.